The Nature of Author

Class Review 4

The Nature of Author

This is the time to find the nature of writer, and I am still so far from that way.  What I do since I got forth semester is not usual, it made me crazy but so great circumstances.  Writing is not only writing, this needs a massive thing that I should sacrifice and I don’t want to take a leave from this incredible journey.  I know all of this will give so much pain but I believe something beautiful still waits for me in unexpected time.

            Becoming a qualified writer is not easy case, I should pass three complicated phase: Reader, Quality Reader, Writer and finally Quality writer.  All of those are so much painful, when I believe that reader is easiest thing but I was wrong. Essentially, reading is complex activity and to keep my focus still in mind is more complicated even more when I see so many rigid words in literature.

             

            A reader should engage in all particular problems in the book and it needs a proper background. Big problem will show its terrible face when reader doesn’t know what the background is and it usually happens in academic written which is identic with high literacy.  Additionally, academic writing is going to be a dangerous when I should deserve critical thinking in mind and take it out into some line in my log book, probably this is the hardest one.

            In another cases, a box with full complexity will appear after being a quality reader. If a reader need a great of understanding then the author need space of excellences to connect with their reader.  A good writer should provide proper diction and knowledge toward their target, this is a kind of way to make qualified reader rather than helpless reader.

            An author should describe that they can make good adaptation with their reader, they should not make a high literacy or unknown background in their book. Author has his own target, it will be much better if they can engage with the reader’s knowledge. If the author can’t engage with their knowledge reader so they are called by such failure.

            When I wrote my essay under Chaedar’s article: Classroom Discourse to Foster Religious Harmony, I think I have made a big failure. I was not a good author in that time, I have just know what should I write in my essay exactly. Here we are:

1.      It should be explain classroom or why should classroom

Class is the beginning of development, it is a sacred site and not everyone can join I there. Only academic persons will engage with the complexity that happens in classroom.

2.      My essay should contain remarks on classroom is complicated place.

So many differences have a life in the class. We are united from a great number of races, background of family, and characteristic. The big key of classroom discourse is INTERACTION, and unfortunately I didn’t put them as a big point. I didn’t explore how complicated TALK, since I know that TALK is an essence of interaction but I have never thought that should be put in my essay.

3.      Meaning-making practice

a.       Ideology is a set of belief.

Although I stand with so many differences in my classroom, but ideology should not be changed just because of those.

b.      Values

Examining the value in the class. Simple example, we will not be a discipline person when we just learn about theory, it needs example not line of sentence.

            Making academic writing especially critical essay should have big awareness, there are holes will make me fall down. This is the right structure for my essay:

1.      Definition of classroom

2.      Essence of classroom discourse: interaction and talk

3.      How classroom discourse foster peace among differences of religion

4.      What is connectedness between religious harmony and classroom discourse?

Author,

Susi Nurjanah

           

             

             

             

‘