Saturday, March 29, 2014
Created By:
Mega Widiastuti
Howard
Zinn: Be a Hero by Radicalism
Introduction
Howard
Zinn be a hero for many people in the world.
By a history genre book, Howard Zinn want to change all perspective people
especially citizen of Amerika that Columbus is not discoverer America continent. History is a science
that studies any event or occurence that have occurred
in the past in human life. In the human
life, historical events is
an event which timeless,
unique, and important. To find out
history need a historian that serves to perpetuate, and tell when it
happened, next who the characters involved, who the inventor, and the events of
what happened at that time.
On the other hand,
Howard Zinn
also awaken us
to care
about the history.
As humans we do not just hear
and accept the history
that has happened. But, we should be able to criticized whether it
is history really
happened or just
a fabrication.
Summary
In the article Speaking Truth to Power with Books Zinn could be called as a
hero of the people, which can uncover the hidden
history. Howard Zinn said that the inventor American continent
is not Columbus, in the first
book he wrote “A
People’s History of The United States” Howard Zinn mentions facts
about who exactly Columbus, the facts are
Colombus is genosida, killer, and he lie about discoverer Amerika continent. In the point of view Zinn Columbus is not as great inventors, or a hero
to Americans, but Zinn view that
Columbus as a conqueror hypocritical and cruel because to achieve his desire
Columbus tortured, kidnapped, killed,
and mutilated the
original residents.
The
other reason that explain by Howard Zinn is Christopher Colombus raped one of
the daughters of the Spain nobility who was still 13 years old, that was the
reason why he was sent off to look for the new world namely India. He did not find that land, instead he found
America land which was considered as India by him at the first time. Christopher Colombus background also is so
bad, he found America only because of his bad attitude, raping. No wonder Howard Zinn wanted to erase the
understanding about Christopher Colombus which was wrong. Howard Zinn also wanted to change the wrong
knowledge of every person in the society about Christopher Colombus, so the
children as the next generations will not get that fantasy anymore and
recognize that Christopher Colombus is nothing and even bad man. Then also Howard Zinn wanted to deliver that
is absolutely unnecessary to adore him and even establish the Colombus day does
not make sense, because bad man is not proper to be admired.
Main
Body (Critique)
Why this article should be criticized? Because, in the article “Speaking Truth to Power with Books”
Zinn no
perfection in show the evidences. There
are some of weaknesses that found in the article.
Firstly, Howard
Zinn not explain actually who is that
found Amerika continent, I think Howard Zinn just able to critic, but he not
gave statement to be better. Howard Zinn
also did
not recognized that Islam is the
first to discover the America
continent. This is because Zinn is a
Jew, while
Cheng Ho is a Muslim. So, there was a
possibility that the reason why Howard Zinn never wrote Laksamana Cheng Ho as
the first discover of America was only because of many conflicts between Islam
and Jewish itself. This reason also is supported by the year of A People's History of the United States publication
which was written by Howard Zinn. That book published in 1980 when the
conflict between Islam and Jewish got worse. So, Zinn was afraid if his
own writing instead featured the intensity of Muslim. Next, because Howard Zinn is a jew also he did not like Americans,
so
that he search about history, government of Amerika, and try to found the
mistake of Amerika. Some people also
said that Zinn is radical
according to Michael Kazin
argued that Zinn is too focused on class
conflict, in the fact there is connected between
literacy and radicalism as write in the book “A Cultural History of the English
Language” The
writers used radicalism a new language to spread a social message.(
Knowles, Gerry. 1997:96). In
the seventeenth century was happened radical language that use in the Bible
and religious concepts it aims to convey political and
social message. After that, here there is some way to
understand radical text between language and ideologi. In
order to make sense of a radical text, one has to imagine oneself in their
literacy culture.
(
Knowles, Gerry. 1997:97)
From this the key, it can be concluded that use radicalism is one form of literacy in delivering a social message, so that
the reader could influenced
by the social
message.
Secondly, Howard Zinn said that Columbus
is genosida. But, Howard Zinn not
explain clearly what a form of genosida that he did? And also how many
victims? It is my view that, we need a judicious historian who can provide
authentic data not only able to
judgment, this
is related to discourse and knowledge construction,
the view that knowledge is created through the
discourses of social communities has its roots in the theory of social
constructivism. This suggests that the ways we understand the world, the
categories and concepts we use, are not ‘truths’ proven and fixed for all time
but are specific to particular cultures and periods. In other words, our
knowledge does not result from objective descriptions of what the world is really
like, but emerges in part through our perceptions of that world during our
interactions.( Hyland, K. 2006:39 ).
Thirdly, the
weaknesses of Zinn’s
article is not write all the references when talking about
Columbus and others.
For this reason,
the reference is the power of each reading,
without the reader
that the author is still looking like a
pretend play or
in writing. Reference
is one of the most
important things that will
convince the reader to learn that the author posts, as write in academic writing a
hand book for internationals student.
There are three principal reasons for providing references and
citations:
(a)
To show that you have read some of the authorities on the subject,
which
will give added weight to your writing.
(b)
To allow the reader to find the source, if he/ she wishes to examine
the
topic in more detail.
(c)
To avoid plagiarism. (Bailey, Stephen. 2006:62)
Conclusion
As a result, Howard Zinn can be a hero for us because it can add knowledge the for the reader by the radicalism langauge that
make us care to make sense of a history, and also can change the perspective people to Columbus. But the other facts show, Howard Zinn just able to judgement that everything
which he critics are wrong not make clearly what is the solution, and finally
Zinn saw that the difference is democracy.
References
Knowles, Gerry. (1997). A Cultural History of the English
Language. New York:
Oxford University Press Inc.
Hyland, K. (2006).
English for Academic Purposes.
London: Routledge.
Bailey,S. (2006). Academic
writing: A Handbook for International Students (2nd ed.). New
york: Routledge.


Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)